LrC has recently (late 2019) become capable of very speedy, very multi-threaded bulk preview building with GPU assistance. You won't fully appreciate this advice until it is too late. Try hard to keep each library entirely under a single top-level folder, because this will make life easier for you if you ever have to relocate the library to a new drive in future. Idimager photo supreme vs acdsee software#That way different camera manufacturers' software can easily find relevant picture files. Idimager photo supreme vs acdsee pro#I use DownLoader Pro to give each one a unique name based on camera, capture date and time, and a combination of camera folder number and image number. If you go with LrC and you want to use it to the full, then minimise the amount of editing and especially renaming and relocating that you do in other programs (outside LrC) or else LrC will soon lose track of where the pictures are and its edit commands may no longer be appropriate for those it can find.Īlways import > add files into LrC so that they stay where they were for other programs to find, but do it after you have put them into their final destination and renamed them. Idimager photo supreme vs acdsee full size#My backup system subsequently backs up any new compressed (zipped) backups rather than the full size catalog. That will keep LrC working faster and it avoids having picture files backed up after each edit session, by your well managed backup system I have LrC backup the catalog (not the actual picture files) at the end of every session. My strong preference is to leave all of the information in the LrC catalog and avoid writing changes to actual picture files. LrC cannot search or access one catalog from within another. LrC can only open and use one catalog at a time, but more catalogs are possible. incompatible, or just private) for different pictures. One exception might be if you need different keyword sets (e.g. I strongly recommend that you keep all pictures in one catalog so that LrC can give you the best access to all of them. If you want your catalogs backed up then simply instruct LrC to do it automatically.Ī library of 100k files will be no problem at all for a single LrC catalog. If you want your picture files backed up then you do it. LrC looks after the catalogs but never forget that you look after the libraries. LrC builds a catalog (database), or catalogs, of your image library (or libraries). That's in addition to using various drives and/or folders to hold the files. Lightroom Classic is certainly very capable when it comes to managing picture files, with facilities such as collections(manual and automatic), star ratings, colour labels, hierarchical keywording, and a whole heap of search capabilities. I will be interested in other options as well. The AI is ok, not perfect, for keywording. Thanks in advance to those who care to share. I'm even looking into using lightroom just for the cataloging (though i have resisted adobe all these years) It's the organizational, library, cataloging that i'm now interested in. I have used capture one express for the fuji files. I often edit using a combo of photo and luminar but that is for the quickie stuff. I have used nikon dslrs for years, stepped into mirrorless with fuji and have just started last week with a sony a7r3. I looked at photo mechanic and found it very tedious. I'm still using apple photo and it doesn't work well. What are folks using to manage their 100k image libraries? I am here with what i imagine is an often asked question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |